![]() ![]() Some have pointed out it's the Antis/Haters playing a large part because of their distaste for Hololive. So who else is to blame? The government, maybe, but unless we're willing to go to war, they can't really change their ways of how to run a country (and the 'nations' aligned with it) for reasons we may never understand. The publisher has to take responsibility for this action, but I don't think they're entirely at fault for resorting to these measures if they didn't intend to do so from the start. Again, I think they haven't made an official statement that makes or breaks their stand to avoid receiving further damage from one of the opposing sides (more likely the side that involves government for obvious reasons). If they don't care, let alone support the policies enacted for businesses in this country, then we can just wipe the majority of what I wrote down to here. If they had to resort to these measures in order to avoid having their game taken down, then I can understand why they did what they had to. This is a huge loss on the publisher's part, I think, and I'm not sure how this will affect the future content they may produce in the future (or whether they take down songs because of this event) but I think that we can agree that policies, or specifically the people who made them, are real stick up the a$$e$.ĭo I have a distaste for the publisher after this? Well, that depends. This unfortunately brought Hololive to cutting ties with this publisher and any companies having anything to do with the countries/regions they're associated with (a good move on their part, I think, in order to avoid repeats of this event again). ![]() ![]() I think they're trying to play safe and reduce the number and severity of wounds afflicted on them as possible. ![]() My bets for why this publisher hasn't made an official statement yet (and possibly never will) is to not just garner more hate from the fans of the game, but to not get into more trouble with the people in charge of that policy. To just cut all that off, they couldn't do something so regressive without some valid reason. You'd want your stuff to be as widespread as possible, getting anyone to buy it and enjoy it for themselves. People are directing hate at the publisher for making the request for the take down, but what I want to know is 'Is it the will of the publisher, or the will of the government using said publisher to make the request?' Did the publisher have to 'agree' to this policy in order to make their game a success? That's possible, but would they go to such lengths if they didn't get some warning from the guys who made the policy in the first place?Īnyone would see that banning the company from streaming your content, the same company that helped make said content flourish, is shooting itself in the foot. To put my 2 cents into this discussion, yes, the publisher may have been the one to request Hololive to take it down, because it was going against this company policy that the government plays some part in. Basically, there's hate being directed in multiple ways, and I'm uncertain to whether I should get the DLC because of this drama. Now the game's getting hate for reasons not involving the content itself, but the acts of the publishers behind this game. I bought the game's base-not DLC 'yet'-because one of those v-tubers influenced me into buying it, and I enjoy it when I have the spare time to play games. So I was surprised of the huge review bomb (learned that term today), and so I looked into it and was unaware that Hololive v-tubers had to take down/private videos relating to this game because of the publisher(?) requesting Hololive to take them down due to political reasons. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |